Triple alterations (triple sharp, triple flat)
Hi,
Would it be possible to include triple sharps and triple flats (that play back) in the accidentals palette? I know these are rare but can be useful to notate neighbor tones or chromatically altered appogiaturas in remote keys. These symbols do exist and have, occasion been used in 19th and 20th century music.
http://dictionary.onmusic.org/terms/3683-triple_flat
http://dictionary.onmusic.org/terms/3687-triple_sharp
Thanks.
Comments
A large variety of less-common symbols including way more accidentals than msot of us ever knew existed cna be found in the Symbols palette (press "Z").
They won't play back, but you can always use the Tuning setting in the Inspector. Add the note as a double sharp, hide the double sharp, add the triplet sharp, then set the Tuning to 100.
In reply to A large variety of by Marc Sabatella
Thanks. That will definitely do in a pinch. It would still be nice to have something that plays back automatically and transposes correctly, but since it is so rare it's not a major issue.
Another way to do it is to place the note on the stave at the correct (enharmonic) pitch, place the accidental and then first use the Inspector to move the accidental symbol Horizontally to make it look correct and then use the Inspector to move the note Vertically.
In reply to Another way to do it is to by underquark
I guess for me, as a player, readability, so that the intent is clear and I can interpret it easily and accurately is of the first order.
So when I look at your highlighted triple sharp example and analyse it, I see (in the same manner as in the double sharp immediately preceding) that all it is is a tied anticipation, graphically notated for maxim confusion.
Now I'm not against graphics, or indeed anything that will assist the transfer of gesture, but that looks like obfuscation hiding something very simple.
From the link: "Most musicians (professional or amateur) will never see or perform a triple sharp in their entire musical career. "
Best regards,
In reply to I guess for me, as a player, by xavierjazz
There oughtn't not to be absolutely no alternative to a triple flat, shouldn't there not?
In reply to There oughtn't not to be by underquark
That's what I mean, a ckincize cleaar jesture. ! .
In reply to That's what I mean, a by xavierjazz
Ha! Got it!
'....a concise clear gesture'.
:-)
In reply to There oughtn't not to be by underquark
Is that supposed to be some kind of weird cross-medium analog to a triple flat or sharp?
"There ought to be absolutely no alternative to a triple flat, should there?"
Even untangled the syntax doesn't make sense.
In reply to Is that supposed to be some by Isaac Weiss
At last... music syntax meets language syntax!
In the same forum thread!
:-)
In reply to At last... music syntax meets by Jm6stringer
Let's just start a discussion about how to properly format the code to add a fix for this and then we can add programming language syntax as well