Tremolo Being Ignored
Dear Musescore community, in my score their is tremolos being ignored. Please help me fix it if possible. Kind Regards, Mr.Beethoven
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| Report.mscz | 16.03 KB |
Do you still have an unanswered question? Please log in first to post your question.
Comments
Here is an image.
In reply to Here is an image. by Mr.Beethoven
We need a score. What instrument is that?
In reply to We need a score. What… by bobjp
It's Clarinet and the score is attached.
In reply to It's Clarinet and the score… by Mr.Beethoven
Sorry. Long day. I suspect that the tremolo only works on strings and percussion.
In reply to Sorry. Long day. I suspect… by bobjp
No, the tremolo works in 3.7. Regression?
In reply to No, the tremolo works in 3.7… by HildeK
It works in Mu 4.4.3 as well... sort of!
The playback is correct for 8th and 16th tremolos, but with 32nd tremolos the software can't loop the sound quickly enough. The effect with 32nd tremolos is better with the MS Basic sound than with Muse Sounds Clarinet.
![Clarinet_tremolos.png]( "Clarinet_tremolos.png")
Sample score attached.
In reply to It works in Mu 4.4.3 as well… by DanielR
I doubt if a real live clarinet player could play 32nd tremolos at crotchet = 76. Flutes and brass can do flutter tonguing but can reed players?
In reply to I doubt if a real live… by Brer Fox
"can reed players?"
From Alban Berg:Vier Stücke für Klarinette und Klavier (Op 5)
In reply to "can reed players?" From… by SteveBlower
But that example is half the speed or less (taking account of the ritenuto) of the original poster’s example.
In reply to But that example is half the… by Brer Fox
But who is counting the number of flutters? It will be like an unmeasured tremolo on strings - whatever the player can achieve.
In reply to But that example is half the… by Brer Fox
but it's 64th tremolos at half the speed so it's probably likely that it would be a faster tremolo than 32nd on 76 bpm.