Musescore 2.0.3 text won't save if box highlighted--but looks like it does

> Please report it officially
Done.

> Meaning, you would at most lose a few *seconds*
> of work, no more.

Marc, don't make assumptions. It should be obvious that how much work one loses is dependent on how much text was added and how much synthesis went into its composition. In my case it was never less than a minute-and-a-half, and sometimes around five to ten minutes' worth, depending on whether the composer and/or work was well-known or little known to me. Little-known material required more research and more informational text, sometimes as much as a fairly long paragraph. And that's only if the Musescorer included all the pertinent identifying information (Opus or cat. number plus piece number within the collection, if the total opus was a multi-piece composition). If they did not (see next paragraph), the amount of time represented by the lost text could go to half an hour or beyond.

> maybe you are saying you've lost a few
> seconds of work per file over many files

Yes--except, as I indicated above, in my case it was not merely "a few seconds". At an average of four minutes, that loss over hundreds of files comes to a total loss numbering well into hours--all of which needs to be re-created from scratch because after a day or two the short-term memory of exact details is lost. At stake are not merely details concerning composition (dates and so on) but also opus & catalog numbers, exact titles, etc., which Musescorers often fail to include with their post and which must therefore be figured out on ones' own. Far too many posters just slap up their transcription with something like "Scarlatti Sonata", with further information included neither on the download page nor in the score itself, and to identify it precisely requires consulting the most likely scores at IMSLP. Believe me, that takes a lot more than just "a few seconds". Losing the results is a major problem.