Op. 1: Four Preludes for Solo Piano
These are the first pieces I ever wrote. They're, of course, not amazing, but I think they're at least deserving of a listen. Prelude in C is intended not to really be a part of the actual set. It's the equivalent of a B-side, I suppose. Please tell what you think. Thanks.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| Prelude 1 in a.mscz | 4.41 KB |
| Prelude 2 in e.mscz | 5.45 KB |
| Prelude 3 in g.mscz | 5.68 KB |
| Prelude 4 in d.mscz | 9.91 KB |
| Prelude in C.mscz | 3.63 KB |
Comments
For first pieces, they're all pretty great! I would suggest learning modulation, as they all stay staunchly in their home key. Apart from that, they are definitely, as you said worth a listen. I eagerly await Op. 2!
In reply to For first pieces, they're all by [DELETED] 20075
Thanks you very much! Opus 2 has already been written; actually, I have completed Opus 12! I have a second set of preludes; I'll post those. There's a bit more modulation there, but these four I all had kinda intended to stay in the home key.
Cool. They sound kinda jazzy (esp number 3 in 5/4 time).
trash, you cant just play random notes, nobody will remember the melody, nobody will want to listen your prelude again,
you need to learn music theory,
level 1
begin with:
-tonic
-dominant
-subdominant
then:
learn basic chords:
-major
-minor
-diminished
and then the structure of the piece:
-motive
-phrase
-melody
-theme
now you can compose a simple piece, improvisation
level 2
begin with:
-secondary chords
learn intermediate chords:
-7th chords
-9th
-suspended
-half diminshed
-also learn intervals
with that knowledge you should practise composing
In reply to trash, you cant just play… by seletherion
How relevant would that comment be, more than 12 years later...
In reply to How relevant would that… by Jojo-Schmitz
Relevance is in the eye (or wine glass) of the beholder?
In reply to Relevance is in the eye (or… by underquark
To me this looks looks like spam. esp. as that user just posted an identical comment to a similarly old thread
In reply to To me this looks looks like… by Jojo-Schmitz
I wouldn't say it's "spam" per se. (There's no link.) Instead it's an 11-year-old who has recently passed the level 1 theory course and thus "knows everything". Certainly, however old they are, they are only about 11 in their emotional development.
In reply to I wouldn't say it's "spam"… by TheHutch
Spam in the sense of utterly inapropriate, not in the sense of unsolicited commercial content. And even that doesn't need a link ;-)
In reply to Spam in the sense of utterly… by Jojo-Schmitz
Stop, you are making me hungry. Our school used to do spam fritters for lunch. Since Spam is already nearly a quarter fat, deep frying it really takes it up a notch, Take a slice of spam, coat it in thick batter (none of your tempura nonsense) and deep fry it in lard (the perinephric fat from a cow). Especially in Scotland and India, will fry anything (Mars Bar, pizza, sliced tinned corn beef, Spam, haggis balls).
In reply to Stop, you are making me… by underquark
And the American South: deep-fried chicken, fish, pork (of various kinds), cheese, corn, cornbread, cauliflower, okra, zucchini, apples, bananas, pears, Snickers, S'Mores, cheesecake, Oreos, cupcakes, cookies, Coca-Cola, and ice cream. All of these are available at one or more restaurants within about 50 miles of my home in western Virginia. Where I grew up in the Rockies, I had never understood that one could deep-fry ANYTHING!!!