Starting second voice in a measure
I am trying to transcribe a version of Gershwin's Rhapsody in Blue. In several measures there are two voices. The first voice is a whole note. The second voice begins directly after the whole note and is two eighth notes and three quarter notes. It is 4/4 time. I successfully created it in the first measure I tried it. I do not know how I did it and I cannot copy and paste it because the last quarter note becomes an eighth note (accounting for an eighth rest at the whole note of the first voice in the beginning of the measure).
Please see score at this URL: http://musescore.com/user/25966/scores/50287
The third measure is correct. The fourth measure is incorrect (the last note needs to be a quarter note not an eighth note).
Thank you in advance for your help.
Comments
It's kind of hard to say from the description - any way you could post the actual score (your first measure successfully created)? Have you read the Handbook section on Voices? Watched the tutorial videos?
In reply to It's kind of hard to say from by Marc Sabatella
I will upload the score I am working on. The third measure is the one I successfully did. The fourth measure is incorrect. The final eighth note needs to be a quarter note.
I have read the voices in handbook. I have not watched the videos. Thank you for your interest.
In reply to It's kind of hard to say from by Marc Sabatella
The third measure is what I want to reproduce but cannot figure out how.
http://musescore.com/user/25966/scores/50287
In reply to I uploaded the score. by Danielle Celeste
the third measure appears incorrect - it seems everything is half a beat off. That is, the eighth notes should start on 1, but you have them starting on the "and" of one. And whatever you did to make this happen seems to have led this bar to become corrupt, as the last note should only be an eighth note (if the eighths are to start on the "and" of one. So I suspect you'll have to delete the measure and re-enter it.
I'm guessing the start of the problem was not entering the eighth notes on 1. Yes, they are offset physically to avoid collisions, but they should still be entered on beat 1, then nudged if necessary by double clicking and using the arrows.
In reply to the third measure appears by Marc Sabatella
Hi Marc,
I understand what you are saying. The only problem with that is that the example of the third measure--corrupt or not--- is how George Gershwin originally wrote the piece and meant for it to be played. The second voice needs to start the space of an eighth rest behind the whole note(without that space being counted as far as the second voice is concerned so as to end the measure with a quarter note) . That is the original composition. It cannot be changed and the last note in the measure must be a quarter note not an eighth. Can you tell me how to reproduce what I did in the third measure?
In reply to Hi Marc I understand what you by Danielle Celeste
Basically the first eighth note needs to sound right after the whole note not simultaneous with it and the last note NEEDS to be a quarter note.
In reply to Basically the first eighth by Danielle Celeste
That doesn't make sense. What gives you the idea Gershwin didn't intend that eighth note to start on one? that's how he wrote it, according to your passage. Again, just because it is physically shifted to the right doesn't mean it starts late; that's just to avoid a visual collision. If he had wanted it to start on the "and" of one, he'd have put an eighth rest on one. But then, there would have been four and a half beats in the measure. The only way that measure can work is to start on one, just as it is written. Add up the beats - two eighths equals one beats, three quarters are three more beats. That's four beats total. Has to start on one, just like it says. And BTW, I am familiar with the piece; those eighth notes do definitely start on one.
In reply to That doesn't make sense. by Marc Sabatella
Alright. I appreciate and understand everything that you are saying. I accept all that you are saying. I will listen more closely to a played piece. I am a beginning student as you can see by the simplified arrangement of Rhapsody in Blue.
So what you say that I need to do is double-click on the note heads that I need to shift over to maintain the proper 4/4 time of the midi file and the written music.
Thank you for all of your expert advice. I will sincerely and seriously listen how those eighth notes do sound in the original score. I thank you again for your tireless tutelage. You have been immensely helpful
Warmest Best,
Danielle
In reply to That doesn't make sense. by Marc Sabatella
Alright. I appreciate and understand everything that you are saying. I accept all that you are saying. I will listen more closely to a played piece. I am a beginning student as you can see by the simplified arrangement of Rhapsody in Blue.
So what you say that I need to do is double-click on the note heads that I need to shift over to maintain the proper 4/4 time of the midi file and the written music.
Thank you for all of your expert advice. I will sincerely and seriously listen how those eighth notes do sound in the original score. I thank you again for your tireless tutelage. You have been immensely helpful
Warmest Best,
Danielle
In reply to Alright. I appreciate and by Danielle Celeste
that is not what Marc said, not at all. Moving a note head via double click doesn't change the beat it belongs to, just the position it gets shown and printed on the score.
In reply to that is not what Marc said, by Jojo-Schmitz
To be clear: don't take the existing measure as is and nudge the eighths over - they are already on the wrong the beat, and indeed, nudging them won't fix that. Instead, start over (the corrupt measure will probably have to be deleted and reinserted), entering the eighths starting on beat 1, *then* use the double click and arrow method to move the eighths to the right, and/or move the whole notes to the left. You can also right click, note properties, and play with the additional leading/trailing space. It's a bit of trial and error, but it definitely needs to start with the notes being entered on the correct beats. Realistically, there is no need to move them over as far as you have them here - that actually created some confusion, as it can make it look like the eighths start after the whole note. Just a slight offset - enough so that it doesn't make the whole notes look like they are half notes attached to the stem - would make it clearer.
In reply to To be clear: don't take the by Marc Sabatella
I absolutely understand. I have already deleted the corrupt measure. And done exactly as you suggested above to measure three.
Here is the URL of the edited score. http://api.musescore.com/user/25966/scores/50371
Thank you again for your expert carefulness.
Danielle
In reply to I absolutely understand. I by Danielle Celeste
You're welcome, and you updated score looks great so far!
In reply to You're welcome, and you by Marc Sabatella
I completed the score. I just wanted you to see it.
I have a question regarding accellerando, ritardando and a tempo. I have not been able to find these dynamics on Musescore. Any direction is greatly appreciated.
http://musescore.com/user/25966/scores/50541
In reply to I completed the score. I just by Danielle Celeste
Looks good. I especially like the phrase mark that twists from the top to bottom staff in the last bar.
As of the tempo markings you mention, there might not be predefined markings, but you can type anything you like into the tempo text dialog, or double click and edit any tempo text already entered.
In reply to Looks good. I especially by Marc Sabatella
Thank you for all your help, Marc. You're the best. I plan on reading our Lead Sheet tutorials soon. Ciao, Danielle