Bring back the Album feature
Even though it was kinda buggy and didn't always work perfectly, it should still be a feature of the program, and I haven't been able to find a reason for its removal besides "calibration".
Do you still have an unanswered question? Please log in first to post your question.
Comments
An improved version of this feature is on the roadmap, but I don't think there is any specific plan or timeline for it.
In reply to An improved version of this… by Marc Sabatella
Thanks for the response, Marc. I don't mean to sound pushy or anything, but it would just be a neat thing to have. Do you know if there is any way I can replicate the effects of the feature, i.e. joining multiple .mscz files together into one .mscz file?
In reply to Thanks for the response,… by [DELETED] 26815890
Add the necessary instruments (which you can then hide) and use the section breaks?
Insert vertical frame (Title, Composer...)
In reply to Add the necessary… by Shoichi
I would do that, but the files I'm trying to compile are really complex and have a lot of time signature changes, repeat barlines, etc. and would take hours to manually initialize like that. If push comes to shove, I'll do it, but I was wondering if there's any way to emulate the album function directly,
In reply to I would do that, but the… by [DELETED] 26815890
For something like that, I'd have been quite scared of the album feature anyhow - as you mention, it was quite limited and buggy. Instead, I'd be exporting to PDF then joining those in something like PDFsam.
In reply to For something like that, I'd… by Marc Sabatella
The album feature wasn't good at all. I liked the decision to remove it. But for the future I hope it will come back as a copy of the "flow" concept of Dorico. The concept of several movements inside one opus is proven by musical tradition. I will love it!