Playback ignores second ending on second first/second ending
I have problems with the playback function in a piece where I use multiple first/second endings. An example is attached to illustrate what I mean. Basically I have passage A, finished by a first/second ending and passage B, also finished by a first/second ending. In passage B, the playback ignores the second ending and repeats the first ending, after which stopping the piece.
If I remove the first first/second ending, the second first/second ending suddenly works fine. That is weird ... Can someone explain me what is going wrong and why?
I use version 3.2.1.7498.
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
Repeats.Test_.mscz | 5.7 KB |
Comments
Workaround: change that 2nd >Volta's repeat list from "2" to "2,1" (the 2 being the 2nd round of the 1st repeat, the 1 being the 1st round of the 2nd repeat)
In reply to Workaround: that change that… by Jojo-Schmitz
(the 2 being the 2nd round of the 1st repeat, the 1 being the 1st round of the 2nd repeat)
Wow!... 😂... I'm delighted you added the (seemingly convoluted) logic behind it.
Your solution works, but I'm wondering about @Peter's statement (in his attachment below) that: "Only 1. Volta can appear between repeat bars."
To me, his score looks simpler and doesn't require the (strange?) Inspector volta adjustment.
[Behind Bars, anyone?]
In reply to (the 2 being the 2nd round… by Jm6stringer
The 2. volta with 1 & 2 repeats becomes cosmetic only because it is essentially ignored. However, it does correctly show that the A section has a 2nd variation, even though it is integrated in the B section. I avoid voltas wherever possible, for similar reasons to this case, but for correct markup, it is neccessary to do the extra work.
In reply to Workaround: that change that… by Jojo-Schmitz
entering 2,1 is identical to entering 1,2
Both reference the start repeat (in this case for m3), that 2nd volta of m3 has no relation with the start repeat from the score when unwinding internally.
Hi, I deal with repeats a lot, but am no expert. Please check attachment.
In reply to Hi, I deal with repeats a… by Peter Gostelow
From your attachment:
Only 1. Volta can appear between repeat bars.
Seems like sound advice (see what I did there ;-)
Also, to me, your score looks simpler.
I wonder what others think.
In reply to Hi, I deal with repeats a… by Peter Gostelow
Hi Peter, your reply helped me a lot to fix the problem. My score was just wrong. I have attached the result.
In reply to Hi Peter, your reply helped… by Jan-Frederik Carl
Yea, that back-to-back repeat seemed strange to me, but doable, however the change is certainly more interesting.