Arpeggio doesn't work on semi-quavers or lower values
Just as the subject says :).
I'm using a Mac 10.4.11 - MuseScore 0.9.6.
Just as the subject says :).
I'm using a Mac 10.4.11 - MuseScore 0.9.6.
Do you still have an unanswered question? Please log in first to post your question.
Comments
I think it's by design. Because it would be really too short.
In reply to I think it's by design. by [DELETED] 5
Not if it was tied (into another bar - which I need).
It depends on the BPM as well.
In reply to I think it's by design. by [DELETED] 5
I've attached a bit of the track and its transcription (94 BPM). It's really a quaver in length, but I'm forced to divide it into a tied set of semi-quavers because of the bar lap.
Upon testing the software again, the lowest value it will playback correctly is actually a dotted semi-quaver (in certain instances - it didn't happen once).
A suggestion (if you wanted to implement a limit) is arpeggios beginning with values less than a dotted semi-quaver should only work if they're tied (and everything else is left to the wise discretion of the user).
In reply to I've attached a bit of the by chen lung
Sorry to bump :).
In reply to Sorry to bump :). by chen lung
Can someone please answer this?
I've begun another piece and encountered it again.
In reply to Can someone please answer by chen lung
As I said before it's by design. If the number of notes in a chord * the length of 32nd note is greater than the length of the chord then the arpeggio is not played. There is no logic for tied notes. That's why with a 2 16th note chord, there is no arpeggio.
All arpeggiated notes are played as a 32nd note offset in the other case, whatever the duration of the chord is. If you have an idea for a better algorithm in next version, speak out.
In reply to As I said before it's by by [DELETED] 5
Sorry, not sure I fully understand.
The music I have requires a tied note because it goes into another bar (it is the length of a 8th note otherwise). Have you looked at the .ZIP file?
If it's a problem, can we file a report (so that we can introduce an algorithm - if that's what's needed)?