MuseScore 3.6 Release Candidate Is Out!
We are pleased to announce the release candidate of MuseScore 3.6, the largest (and last) of our updates to version 3. This is our 'engraving release', which addresses many of the biggest issues affecting the layout and appearance of your sheet music and is the result of a massive collaboration between our community and internal team. It is the first big step towards the type of world-beating engraving capability that we aim to achieve in the future.
Two of the most notable additions in this release are Leland, our new notation font and Edwin, our new typeface. Leland is a highly sophisticated notation style created by our head of product, Martin Keary and our engraving expert, Simon Smith. The aim of Leland is to provide a classic notation style that feels 'just right' with a balanced, consistent weight and a finessed appearance that avoids overly stylised quirks. We will be releasing a video about how (and why) Leland was created to coincide with the official launch of 3.6. Our new typeface, Edwin, is based on New Century Schoolbook, which has long been the typeface of choice by some of the world's leading publishers, chosen specifically as a complimentary companion to Leland. In addition, we have provided new default style settings (margins, line thickness, etc) to compliment Leland and Edwin, which match conventions used by the world's leading publishing houses.
Equally as important as our new notation style is our new vertical layout system. This is switched on by default for new scores and can be activated on older scores too. It is a gigantic improvement to how staves are vertically arranged and will save you hours of work by significantly reducing your reliance on vertical spacers and manual adjustment. We have also created a system for automatically organising the instruments on your score to conform with a range of common conventions (orchestral, marching band, etc.). In addition, newly created scores will also be accurately bracketed by default. You can even specify soloists, which will be arranged and bracketed according to your chosen convention too! These three new systems are the result of a wonderful collaboration between Simon Smith and our community member, Niek van den Berg.
We have also greatly improved how we display the notation fonts: Emmentaler and Bravura, which more accurately match the intentions of the original designers and have included a new jazz font called 'Petaluma' designed by Anthony Hughes at Steinberg.
Lastly, we have made some very useful improvements to our export process, which now includes a new dialog containing lots of practical, time-saving settings. This work was implemented by one of our newest community members, Casper Jeukendrup.
We have lots more to do to improve the engraving capabilities of MuseScore, including important overhauls to our horizontal spacing and beaming systems. MuseScore 3.6 may be a massive step but there are many more steps ahead!
You can install the 3.6 Release Candidate version alongside the version you have currently installed. Please be aware that we have disabled uploads to MuseScore.com for this release candidate. This is a necessary precaution due to the significant alterations made to engraving and score organisation. It will be enabled for the official stable release of MuseScore 3.6
Additional Engraving fixes
- Overhauled style defaults, both general and Leland-specific
- Added feature to indent initial systems of sections
- Improved adjustment of stem lengths on chords outside the stave
- Improvement to the appearance of tremolo and buzzrolls markings
- Correct interpretation of beam spacing and ledger length settings in SMuFL fonts
- Improved positioning of flags, honouring their orientation and design in their respective fonts
- Bracketed accidentals can how have customisable padding inside their parentheses
- Improvements to placement and spacing of accidentals with regard to ledger lines
- Improvements with spacing involving invisible items
Known Issues
- Uploads to MuseScore.com have been disabled. The will be enabled again for the official stable release of 3.6
- There is an issue with some Music XML imports, which do not always accept our new defaults without some manual work. Depending on the source of the file, font faces and sizes may be specified locally for each text item. A dialog will be presented when importing an XML file to ask if you wish to apply the text font Edwin to the file or not; this will force the font change but may not affect size or other attributes. It may be possible to reset styles more comprehensively by opening Format → Style and selecting the 'Reset all Styles to Default' option on the bottom left corner of the dialog. After that, you may also need to choose 'Format > Reset Text Style Overrides'. Ultimately, it may be necessary to reset some text items manually
See also the handbook page for the new changes and features
Full release notes are available here
Download MuseScore 3.6 Release Candidate
Windows 64-bit | Windows 32-bit | macOS 10.10 or higher |
Linux AppImage (64-bit only) |
Comments
Full list of downloads (including portable app) at https://github.com/musescore/MuseScore/releases/tag/v3.6_release_candid…
In reply to Full list of downloads … by Riaan van Niekerk
a duck walked up to a lemonade stand and he said to the man running the stand "hey bumb bumb bumb, got any grapes?"
In reply to a duck walked up to a… by Camertheskier@…
The man said "No, we just sell lemonade but its cold and its fresh and its all homemade!!! Can I get you a glass?
In reply to The man said "No, we just… by MuseLemon
Then he waddled away!
In reply to Then he waddled away! by Cocobattleops09
Waddle waddle waddle. Till the very next day.
Is Musescore Drumline 2.0 included?
In reply to Is Musescore Drumline 2.0… by Sanethebro
MDL is included in the same version as for all 3.x
In reply to Is Musescore Drumline 2.0… by Sanethebro
But to be clear, "included" doesn't mean it is installed by default, you'd still need to install it yourself if you hadn't previously. And actually, whether or not it sees your existing installation probably depends on your system and whether you have it installed in MuseScore3Development or just MuseScore3.
In reply to Is Musescore Drumline 2.0… by Sanethebro
We're working on it. It is coming soon.
The spacing of ties with dotted notes seems not to be correct
In reply to The spacing of ties with… by Hubato
But no change to any prior version, or is it?
IMHO a kown issue since long, see #45576: Tie on same side of staff/ledger line as augmentation dot = collision
In reply to But no change to any prior… by Jojo-Schmitz
No change, that's true. ;)
Happy New Year!
Why is the activated note no longer colored blue?
In reply to Why is the activated note no… by gustebus10
Not sure what you mean by "activated", but if you are referring to selecting a note - say, by clicking it - nothing has changed recently. It still highlights blue. That was a change a year or so ago to the specific shade of blue used I think, maybe you hadn't updated recently enough to notice? Or maybe you customized your shade long ago in Edit / Preferences / Advanced but the release candidate is not by default using your existing settings?
In reply to Not sure what you mean by … by Marc Sabatella
Or perhaps the note is not in voice 1. When selected, voice 2 notes highlight in green by default for example.
In reply to Or perhaps the note is not… by SteveBlower
True enough, but that hasn't changed in very many years.
In reply to True enough, but that hasn't… by Marc Sabatella
I mean if a note is placed it does not turn blue as with version 3.5.2 with the test version 3.6.0, the voice 1 and 2 and 3 and 4 remain black
In reply to I mean if a note is placed… by gustebus10
Check your voice 1 button in the toolbar, it is also black.
I'm guessing there's a preferences mixup, leading to the voice colors being "empty" thus defaulting to black. You can either reset to factory settings or manually pick new colors in the advanced preferences list.
In reply to Check your voice 1 button in… by jeetee
Solved, put everything back, thanks
On the RC, using macOS 10.15.7, text is all wonky with large scores. With small scores its fine, so my guess is a scaling issue. Is there some setting I have set causing this? This doesn't happen at all on Ubuntu.
I find a bug.
If 'Hide system barline' is checked and unchecked again, the score will not be applied.
In reply to I find a bug. If 'Hide… by Mintsoda-15
I can confirm that, but would note it fixes itself when you reload the score, or if the system layout changes. Also, it's not new. But please do submit this to the issue tracker so it can be dealt with.
Are you saying we cannot upload content on MuseScore.com anymore until the stable release??
In reply to Are you saying we cannot… by Jjboss123
Yes, not with 3.6RC. But you still can with and other 3.x version
In reply to Yes by Jojo-Schmitz
Did you update the problem with spacing on invisible items on beta? If not, when will the stable release come out.
In reply to Did you update the problem… by Jjboss123
Try the RC and check yourself.
In reply to Did you update the problem… by Jjboss123
Not sure which problem you mean, best if you can post a link to the specific issue you mean. In general, some invisible elements do affect spacing and others don't, by design - this is based on years of input from users as to how these elements are used.
One aspect of this that was not by design had to do with invisible key and time signatures and the spacing at the beginning of a measure. All reported problems having to do with this are indeed fixed for 3.6 RC.
New topic. How does "Improvements with spacing involving invisible items" work? Aggressively? Does it work for invisible notes? Am I supposed to see a change, especially from scores I've already done?
In reply to New topic. How does … by Jjboss123
The only such changes I am aware of involve the behavior of invisible key and time signatures at the start of a system, bugs involving that spacing have been fixed. I am not aware of any bugs that have reported involving spacing of invisible notes, they have always work as designed. That is, invisible notes on visible staves can still be used for spacing purposes as always, but notes on invisible staves are ignored as always.
So the only changes you should see are to fix the spacing at the beginning of scores involving invisible key or time signatures. At least, the only changes relevant to that. Other improvements were made as well, but most of them require you to opt in by changing to the new default fonts and/or applying the new style defaults.
In reply to The only such changes I am… by Marc Sabatella
Okay. That is one of the major bust I am having really having to deal with though. Irregular. Spacing. As you can see here on my transcription last year, at the end of the exposition on the first movement, invisible notes represent the trills. They are not much notes, in fact it is a quintuplet. It still affects both staves' notes and is very displeasing:
https://musescore.com/user/22267676/scores/6295986
In reply to Okay. That is one of the… by Jjboss123
As I said, if you wish to have invisible notes that don't affect spacing, simply add them to a separate staff and make the staff itself invisible. Only place invisible notes on a visible staff if you do want them to affect spacing, like to get certain proportional spacing effects. It's very important to support both - invisible notes that do affect spacing, and invisible notes that don't. That's why we provide both options. So just choose the one you want for any given situation.
In reply to As I said, if you wish to… by Marc Sabatella
So I have to write a whole separate staff on the piano for this feature?
Step by step, please.
In reply to So I have to write a whole… by Jjboss123
You don't need to write a whole separate staff - only the passages where you wish to write notes that are heard and note seen. So simply add the staff (in Edit / Instruments), then put the notes you want to hear on that staff rather than the visible staff. When you're all done, go back to Edit / Instruments and make the staff invisible. It's the same basic process you'd also use for creating visible representations of these ornaments as ossia, except you'd mark the staff cutaway instead of invisible. It's actually considerably easier and less fiddly than dealing with invisible notes on the main staff.
if you have further questions about any of this, please start a new thread (since this has nothing to do with 3.6, this feature has been present for years), and attach a short example representing your best attempt at this, and we can them advise further.
Hi, does anybody know, when RC 3.6 will be released?
In reply to Hi, does anybody know, when… by roland bublitz
3.6RC was released the moment this post announced it release..
Likely you're wondering about when the final/stable/real 3.6 will be released? The answer is "any day now". There is some small polish still ongoing, but it should be less than a week out from what I can guess.
In reply to 3.6RC was released the… by jeetee
Ah I see. Thnx for reply
Great work, I couldn't get it to install under windows, got a "Installation Directory Must Be On A Local Hard Drive" error.
Got it to install using this: https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/forums/t/710094/installation-directory…
But given this users also talks about musescore this makes me wonder if it has anything to do with the musescore installer in particular. BTW i had the same with the public beta