SIMPLE AND VERY EXPLICIT INSTRUCTIONS.
You do NOT have to click on any note or any stave or anything else in the file
that you have loaded into Musescore.
Just go to the top of the screen. Click "Edit" and then "Instruments".
This will open a dialogue box entitled "Instruments".
In a big window on the right side of that box you will see a list of the staves.
The first column gives their names. The second column, labelled "Visible", is a column
of little boxes. They will probably each have a "tick" or "V" in them. Just
click on to uncheck the little box in each stave which you want to disappear.
Then of course click OK and the job is complete.
Dear friends, Thank you for your previous attempts to help us. But most
of your explanations rather confused me. This simple solution is
"buried" somewhere (page 39) in the 246 pages of the main handbook. The
fact that this feature is possible is a wonderful present for those of
us in lockdown at home who want to (try to) play a concerto with the
wonderful accompaniment of "robots", but without being confused by the
visible jungle of all the notes that they are playing. Thank you
Musescore.
Of course you are right. BUT the combination of the first and second sentence caused some confusion, as is confirmed by the number of questions that other people needed to ask following that response. That is why I thought my very explicit clarification could be helpful.
To be clear: "right click" means click with the *right* (as opposed to left) mouse button. That terminology is obvious enough for two-button mice. For a one-button mouse, the equivalent gesture is usually Ctrl+click. For touchpads it might be Ctrl+click, Ctrl+tap, or two finger tap. Consult the documentation for your device if you aren't sure.
Anyhow, whatever the gesture is for your device, you need to that on the staff to display the context menu that contains "Staff Properties" and other actions.
But as noted, to make a staff invisible - if that is your goal - you can do that by pressing "I" (shortcut for Edit / Instruments) and hiding the staff in the resulting dialog.
It's also possible you are trying to do something else, like automatically staves that are empty for some particular system, or delete a staff completely, etc. We can give you more specific help if you explain in more detail what you are trying to do (and attaching the score you are working on is usually helpful too).
It's not totally clear what you mean when you say you highlighted some measures an unclicked the visible box.
There would not normally any "Visible" box available after selecting measures. The only cases I can think of here is if those measure happened to be completely empty so the selection contained nothing but rests, or else if the piece was in 4/4 time and every measure in the selection contained a whole note. In either of these cases, the Inspector would indeed show a Visible checkbox, to control the visibility of those rests or notes. And unchecking it would cause those rests or notes to become invisible. They would show up grey on screen so you can still edit them, but invisible when printing. The measures themselves remain, just the contents are invisible.
However, I am thinking it is pretty unlikely that this is actually what you intend. My guess is that you either want to delete those measures completely, or else you want to hide the entire measures (probably because they are empty). To delete measures, select them and press Ctrl+Delete (or Edit / Measure / Delete Selected Measures). To automatically hide all empty measures where possible, use Style / General / Hide empty staves. This will still leave empty measures on staves that also contain non-empty measures, as per usual engraving convention, but if you really want "holes" in the score where the empty measures appear, you can right click them individually, go to Measure Properties, and uncheck "Visible" there for the particular staff on which you wish the hole to appear.
If that doesn't solve your problem, please attach your score and describe in more detail what you are actually trying to accomplish.
Yes, the measures are empty; I just didn't want them appearing when printed. They're at the end of certain lines that stop at the right side of the page, so each line is a new staff (ie. scales only taking up 3 measures per line, or chord progressions taking up 4 measures, instead of continuing on.)
I don't see any empty measures in your example, but if I understand you correctly, you are wishing certain lines of music to not be stretched to the right margin. Assuming you don't want to simply increase the right margin (maybe you want some lines to still stretch?), then that's still something different yet. Instead of invisible measures, you actually just want a horizontal frame (see Frames palette). That's how you prevent a line from stretching the full width of the page.
I have got the same question, but I think my situation is quite different. Since Alpha 3.5 brings the great new feature of audible chord symbols, I am going to put Chord Symbols in a separate System. I do want to see the chord symbols and the measure lines as well, but wish the five note lines and rests to be unvisible. The rests can be selected an changed to invisible. But up to now I haven't found a means to do the same to the note lines. Is this possible, too?
May I ask why you are considering going to all that trouble, though? I can’t think of anything that really buys you. After all you can already mute the channel in the Mixer if you want, change it’s sound, etc. And if there is something I am missing here, and it really does provide some benefit, maybe better to consider how we could address that deficiency so people don’t resort to awkward workarounds like adding invisible staves just for chord symbols.
Marc, sure you may ask. Since the chord playback feature is available I find it handy to have a "harmony track" that does not take too much space. So I can use it to put it over the melody and print it. I can also use it to experiment with solo parts or bass lines. I could attach the chords to the melody line, sure. But after changuing the melody, e.g. deleting part of the melody, the chords disappear, too.
Maybe the way I do it isn't the smartest way but it works for me and up to now I do not know a better one.
Thanks for the explanation, although it's still not really clear to me what you mean. If you're just experimenting, it would seem you don't need to go to all the trouble of hiding staff lines. Creating an extra staff with chords if it helps, but when you're done experimenting, just delete that staff. Perosnally, I'd add the chords where I wanted it and delete them when I didn't need them anymore. Also, for the record, chords won't disappear when you edit the melody if you uncheck them in the selection filter. So probably there are indeed better ways. But if it works, go for it!
There is another benefit I see in a seperate chord system. When using this as a rehersal play along it is easy to mute the solo or melody part while still beeing able to heare the harmony. Is there any means realizing this by a different approach?
Comments
Yes, right click, staff properties, instrument
Or just 'I' and in that dialog make the staff invisible
In reply to Yes, right click, staff by Jojo-Schmitz
what dialogue? what instrument? when i went to staff properties, theres no instrument. and went i went to the instrument, I can't find a dialogue
In reply to what dialogue? what by KeldeoClub
Look again then. In the right hand side of the add instruments dialog there is a tick box, until to make that staff invisible :-)
In reply to Look again then. In the right by Jojo-Schmitz
ahh I see thanks! :]
In reply to Look again then. In the right by Jojo-Schmitz
Thank you for posting this answer!!!
In reply to Yes, right click, staff by Jojo-Schmitz
SIMPLE AND VERY EXPLICIT INSTRUCTIONS.
You do NOT have to click on any note or any stave or anything else in the file
that you have loaded into Musescore.
Just go to the top of the screen. Click "Edit" and then "Instruments".
This will open a dialogue box entitled "Instruments".
In a big window on the right side of that box you will see a list of the staves.
The first column gives their names. The second column, labelled "Visible", is a column
of little boxes. They will probably each have a "tick" or "V" in them. Just
click on to uncheck the little box in each stave which you want to disappear.
Then of course click OK and the job is complete.
Dear friends, Thank you for your previous attempts to help us. But most
of your explanations rather confused me. This simple solution is
"buried" somewhere (page 39) in the 246 pages of the main handbook. The
fact that this feature is possible is a wonderful present for those of
us in lockdown at home who want to (try to) play a concerto with the
wonderful accompaniment of "robots", but without being confused by the
visible jungle of all the notes that they are playing. Thank you
Musescore.
In reply to SIMPLE AND VERY EXPLICIT… by mcwikel
What you wrote is literally the 2nd sentence of the first response given in this thread.
In reply to What you wrote is literally… by jeetee
Of course you are right. BUT the combination of the first and second sentence caused some confusion, as is confirmed by the number of questions that other people needed to ask following that response. That is why I thought my very explicit clarification could be helpful.
In reply to SIMPLE AND VERY EXPLICIT… by mcwikel
THANK YOU! Your explanation is so much clearer than the briefer explanations above it.
In reply to SIMPLE AND VERY EXPLICIT… by mcwikel
No, that hides all staves for the instrument, not just the one you want.
In reply to No, that hides all staves… by mirabilos
MuseScore 4 will allow you to hide staves individually within instruments, but indeed, currently, that's not possible.
Hello,
I don't even find the "right-click" -> staff properties options. How do I get there?
Fred
In reply to Hello, I don't even find the by Fred Guldentops
Click on the stave.
In reply to Hello, I don't even find the by Fred Guldentops
To be clear: "right click" means click with the *right* (as opposed to left) mouse button. That terminology is obvious enough for two-button mice. For a one-button mouse, the equivalent gesture is usually Ctrl+click. For touchpads it might be Ctrl+click, Ctrl+tap, or two finger tap. Consult the documentation for your device if you aren't sure.
Anyhow, whatever the gesture is for your device, you need to that on the staff to display the context menu that contains "Staff Properties" and other actions.
But as noted, to make a staff invisible - if that is your goal - you can do that by pressing "I" (shortcut for Edit / Instruments) and hiding the staff in the resulting dialog.
It's also possible you are trying to do something else, like automatically staves that are empty for some particular system, or delete a staff completely, etc. We can give you more specific help if you explain in more detail what you are trying to do (and attaching the score you are working on is usually helpful too).
I highlighted some measures and un-clicked the "visible" box. Will these "invisible measures disappear when the page is printed?
In reply to I highlighted some measures… by Justin Peoplesworth
Yes.
see: https://musescore.org/en/handbook/viewing-and-navigation#visibility-opt…
In reply to I highlighted some measures… by Justin Peoplesworth
They should be invisible on your screen. If not, you did something wrong, like make a measure in a hidden staff invisible.
In reply to I highlighted some measures… by Justin Peoplesworth
It's not totally clear what you mean when you say you highlighted some measures an unclicked the visible box.
There would not normally any "Visible" box available after selecting measures. The only cases I can think of here is if those measure happened to be completely empty so the selection contained nothing but rests, or else if the piece was in 4/4 time and every measure in the selection contained a whole note. In either of these cases, the Inspector would indeed show a Visible checkbox, to control the visibility of those rests or notes. And unchecking it would cause those rests or notes to become invisible. They would show up grey on screen so you can still edit them, but invisible when printing. The measures themselves remain, just the contents are invisible.
However, I am thinking it is pretty unlikely that this is actually what you intend. My guess is that you either want to delete those measures completely, or else you want to hide the entire measures (probably because they are empty). To delete measures, select them and press Ctrl+Delete (or Edit / Measure / Delete Selected Measures). To automatically hide all empty measures where possible, use Style / General / Hide empty staves. This will still leave empty measures on staves that also contain non-empty measures, as per usual engraving convention, but if you really want "holes" in the score where the empty measures appear, you can right click them individually, go to Measure Properties, and uncheck "Visible" there for the particular staff on which you wish the hole to appear.
If that doesn't solve your problem, please attach your score and describe in more detail what you are actually trying to accomplish.
In reply to It's not totally clear what… by Marc Sabatella
Hi, Marc!
Yes, the measures are empty; I just didn't want them appearing when printed. They're at the end of certain lines that stop at the right side of the page, so each line is a new staff (ie. scales only taking up 3 measures per line, or chord progressions taking up 4 measures, instead of continuing on.)
Thank you! :)
In reply to Hi, Marc!… by Justin Peoplesworth
I don't see any empty measures in your example, but if I understand you correctly, you are wishing certain lines of music to not be stretched to the right margin. Assuming you don't want to simply increase the right margin (maybe you want some lines to still stretch?), then that's still something different yet. Instead of invisible measures, you actually just want a horizontal frame (see Frames palette). That's how you prevent a line from stretching the full width of the page.
How do you make only certain parts invisible and the rest visible?
In reply to How do you make only certain… by FrombeettiMiz
Use Format->Style and check Hide empty staves? I'm not sure if this does what you want.
In reply to How do you make only certain… by FrombeettiMiz
Or maybe right click, Staff Properties, set the Cutaway option?
I have got the same question, but I think my situation is quite different. Since Alpha 3.5 brings the great new feature of audible chord symbols, I am going to put Chord Symbols in a separate System. I do want to see the chord symbols and the measure lines as well, but wish the five note lines and rests to be unvisible. The rests can be selected an changed to invisible. But up to now I haven't found a means to do the same to the note lines. Is this possible, too?
In reply to I have got the same question… by SlyDr
It is, in the staff properties: https://musescore.org/en/handbook/staff-part-properties
Check 'invisible staff lines'.
In reply to It is, in the staff… by jeetee
Thank you
In reply to I have got the same question… by SlyDr
May I ask why you are considering going to all that trouble, though? I can’t think of anything that really buys you. After all you can already mute the channel in the Mixer if you want, change it’s sound, etc. And if there is something I am missing here, and it really does provide some benefit, maybe better to consider how we could address that deficiency so people don’t resort to awkward workarounds like adding invisible staves just for chord symbols.
In reply to May I ask why you are… by Marc Sabatella
Marc, sure you may ask. Since the chord playback feature is available I find it handy to have a "harmony track" that does not take too much space. So I can use it to put it over the melody and print it. I can also use it to experiment with solo parts or bass lines. I could attach the chords to the melody line, sure. But after changuing the melody, e.g. deleting part of the melody, the chords disappear, too.
Maybe the way I do it isn't the smartest way but it works for me and up to now I do not know a better one.
In reply to Marc, sure you may ask… by SlyDr
Thanks for the explanation, although it's still not really clear to me what you mean. If you're just experimenting, it would seem you don't need to go to all the trouble of hiding staff lines. Creating an extra staff with chords if it helps, but when you're done experimenting, just delete that staff. Perosnally, I'd add the chords where I wanted it and delete them when I didn't need them anymore. Also, for the record, chords won't disappear when you edit the melody if you uncheck them in the selection filter. So probably there are indeed better ways. But if it works, go for it!
In reply to Thanks for the explanation,… by Marc Sabatella
There is another benefit I see in a seperate chord system. When using this as a rehersal play along it is easy to mute the solo or melody part while still beeing able to heare the harmony. Is there any means realizing this by a different approach?
In reply to There is another benefit I… by SlyDr
The chord symbols are on a separate subchannel in the mixer, so it should be pretty flexible in that way.