Cautionary accidentals are suddenly no longer displayed in the part
The problem starts in bar 277 when I worked on the piano. Since that time no cautionary accidental is displayed in the parts.
Is there any possibility to solve this problem?
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 4153-V4_4_4.mscz | 726.22 KB |
Comments
Score:
![Screenshot 2025-01-16 122425.png]( "Screenshot 2025-01-16 122425.png")
Part:
![Screenshot 2025-01-16 122529.png]( "Screenshot 2025-01-16 122529.png")
They both look the same ...
In reply to Score: [inline:Screenshot… by HildeK
"They both look the same .."
Except for the missing Eb in the part on the 3rd note of the second 5-tuplet in measure 244 upper staff, that is.
In reply to "They both look the same .."… by SteveBlower
Actually, it is debateable whether that is a courtesy accidental or an essential accidental, given the 8va line. Whichever, it should be the same in the score and in the part.
In reply to Actually, it is debateable… by SteveBlower
And some more information: I made a new setup of the score and copied all music in this new file (4153-V4_4_4_Tom_03.mscz). Here everything is working fine. But why is it like this? What's wrong in the one file (4153-V4_4_4.mscz)?
In reply to "They both look the same .."… by SteveBlower
Hello Steve,
e.g. bar 285-287: In the part 9 accidentals are missing. On your system they are there? [I tried it on 2 PCs and 2 Laptops!] And when I put in new music none of the cautionary accidentals are shown in the parts.
In reply to "They both look the same .."… by SteveBlower
Oh yes, but it comes after the reset part command.
In reply to Oh yes, but it comes after… by HildeK
I have seen on Github that there have been difficulties getting the control of synchronisation between score and parts to work correctly. I couldn't see anything that related specifically to courtesy accidentals. I suggest this should be raised there on Github as a new issue.
In reply to Oh yes, but it comes after… by HildeK
Hello HiledeK,
If your reply means that I used the format-reset command (ctrl + R) and that THIS action caused the problem, then I have to say: no. I didn't use this command.
In reply to Hello HiledeK, If your reply… by Apoll-Edition
No, I was replying to SteveBlower and I meant resetting the parts - not resetting the layout with Ctrl+R.
> Except for the missing Eb in the part ...