Changing from Arco to Pizzicato
When composing in MuseScore 2, how can I switch strings instruments from playing arco to pizzicato (and vice versa)?
When composing in MuseScore 2, how can I switch strings instruments from playing arco to pizzicato (and vice versa)?
Do you still have an unanswered question? Please log in first to post your question.
Comments
(I assume this is the correct forum for this question, I apologize if it isn't)
In reply to (I assume this is the… by kate.lily
If you use pizz. and arco all the time, it saves a a lot of effort if you create some preset text for "pizz." and "arco" using a Custom Workspace:
https://musescore.org/en/handbook/palettes-and-workspaces#custom-worksp…
See the attached screenshot, where I added "pizz." and "arco" to the Text palette. The special text was copied from an existing score, where I had already set the Change Channel property to pizzicato or normal for Channel 1 (as shown on Jojo's link). After that, I can always set the bowed or pizzicato property for an instrument very quickly (on Channel 1 obviously).
In reply to If you use pizz. and arco… by DanielR
Actually this might be a nice addition to the Text palette in the Advanced workspace, probably along with tremolo and (trumpet) mute.
Could you save that palette and attach the .mpal file here?
In reply to Actually this might be a… by Jojo-Schmitz
Thanks for the suggestion. The .mpal file is attached, as requested.
In reply to Thanks for the suggestion… by DanielR
Thanks. So this is the relevant code:
I believe the
<track>8</track>
is not needed, and adding elements with "tremolo", "mute" and "normal" should make it more or less complete, at least for strings and brass.In reply to Thanks. So this is the… by Jojo-Schmitz
OK, I have some code ready to have those included in the text palette, but there's a problem with arco: for violin etc. (i.e. strings) it means normal, but for acoustic bass (the usually plucked instrument, in Jazz) normal is pizzicato and arco is arco, so how would one differentiate between those?
In reply to OK, I have some code ready… by Jojo-Schmitz
Would arco or pizz. ever be used for a guitar?
In reply to Would arco or pizz. ever be… by shoogle
I don't think so, but why are you asking?
In reply to I don't think so, but why… by Jojo-Schmitz
> there's a problem with arco: for violin etc. (i.e. strings) it means normal, but for acoustic bass (plucked instruments) normal is pizzicato and arco is arco, so how would one differentiate between those?
If plucked instruments never user arco or pizz. then maybe you don't need to differentiate.
In reply to > there's a problem with… by shoogle
pizz. is used (rather common) for guitar - and other plucked instruments : https://www.learnclassicalguitar.com/pizzicato.html
In reply to pizz by cadiz1
pizz. is used for guitar, yes, but never arco.
Only exception is acoustic bass.
In reply to > there's a problem with… by shoogle
acoustic bass is the exception, same instrument as contrabass or double bass, but in Jazz, and there more commonly plucked, but occasionally bowed, while in classical music and their strings section it is the other way round
In reply to acoustic bass is the… by Jojo-Schmitz
No one who knows what he is doing would put playing directions on an instrument that is not capable of it. There are other instances where items can be added to wrong instruments such as pedals, that only exist on the piano and some pitched percussion, that can be wrongly applied to the guitar.
In reply to No one who knows what he is… by mike320
Indeed. And adding those to instruments that don't have these channels does nothing.
Poblem is that contrabass and double bass have 3 channels, normal (which here is arco), pizzicato and tremolo, acoustic bass has 5 channels, normal (which here is pizzicato), arco, tremolo, slap and pop
In reply to acoustic bass is the… by Jojo-Schmitz
Unfortunate indeed. if you have to pick, go with the one that works for contrabass and let "acoustic bass" sort it out. I guess in hindsight maybe it would have been better to keep the same channel assignments but somewhere force the instrument to default to channel 2, if that's even possible.
In reply to Unfortunate indeed. if you… by Marc Sabatella
Or name the normal channels properly, arco for strings, pizzicato for acoustic bass
In reply to Or name the normal channels… by Jojo-Schmitz
But that wouldn't help here, would it? Internally we select channels by number, not by name, no?
In reply to But that wouldn't help here,… by Marc Sabatella
No, these staff texts seem to select channels by name.
In reply to No, these staff texts seem… by Jojo-Schmitz
Interesting, looks like you're right. So I guess we could make the change to instruments.xml. The new staff texts wouldn't work out of the box with older scores, but that's no worse than the situation now, so I'm sure I'd call that a compatibility problem. I do know that "normal" channel is special-cased in the code, though, as the default channel name. So I suspect there would be more to this than meets the eye.
In reply to Interesting, looks like you… by Marc Sabatella
OK, yes, that might work indeed. I'll have a go at that.
In reply to OK, yes, that might work… by Jojo-Schmitz
OK, so what texts would usually be used for
a) strings, arco, pizzicato and tremolo. I think for pizzicato it should pizz., for tremolo it should be tremolo, for arco it should be arco, right? and the unnamed 'normal' channel renamed to 'arco'.
b) for acoustic bass, pizzicato and arco, I think for arco it should be arco, but I'm not sure whether for pizzicato it should be normal (and maybe that default channel doesn't need to get named then at all, could use the trumpet normal for this)?
c) for trumpet, mute and normal, mute should be mute I'm sure, not sure though whether normal should be normal?
d) any other instruments with multiple channels that need to get added?
In reply to OK, so what texts would… by Jojo-Schmitz
My opinion from seeing printed music
a. Agreed
b. don't know
c. Mute and open (or con sord. and senza sord. which is more common in classical music)
d. There are other instruments that have multiple channels, like the harp which has a stacato and flageolet playing style. I wouldn't worry about those, let users (including me) who use those worry about the text channels.
I would create a "Playing Styles" palette for these instruments rather than adding them to the Text palette. The texts in the Text palette are generic and include staff text, these are nothing more than edited staff text.
In reply to My opinion from seeing… by mike320
Ah, thanks, open is the term I was looking for, cleats the 'reuse' question for acoustic bass, let's make it pizz./pizzicato there rather than normal
And I think those 5 strings don't harm at all being in the Text palette, Instrument change is there too and also deals with sound changes
So just harp and the e-basses are left with more than one channel but an unnamed 1st one, should that get changed and to what?
Maybe additionaly we could 'special case' normal to always mean 1st channel, named or not
In reply to Ah, thanks, open is the term… by Jojo-Schmitz
See https://github.com/musescore/MuseScore/pull/3500
While at it, I'd like to add (more) channels for guitars, like 'muted', 'jazz', 'distortion', 'overdriven' and maybe 'harmonics', (the latter should be correct, but doesn't sound like harmonics to me) using the corresponding GM instruments, see attachment
Maybe even Soprano/Alto and Tenor/Bass channels to the Women and Men 'instruments' (and the closed score SATB templates), to ease muting/soloing those in Mixer, see other attachment
In reply to See https://github.com… by Jojo-Schmitz
The voice channels are an excellent idea. As far a the guitar is concerned, there are requests for being able to play those back better.
In reply to The voice channels are an… by mike320
The voices channel thing is a hack, but I like it regardless.
I don't quite understand your 2nd sentence
In reply to The voices channel thing is… by Jojo-Schmitz
Sorry for the extreme brevity. I have seen some requests for different techniques to be made possible on a guitar staff. Most people I think work around the shortcomings and adding channels will help with playback. I've seen guitars with channels before, but I couldn't find them doing a quick manual search through the instruments and templates.
In reply to The voices channel thing is… by Jojo-Schmitz
I'm curious if you are going to do a PR to implement these in MuseScore? There has been a related discussion on the French forum concerning this. Even if the hack is rejected, the rest can be implemented.
In reply to I'm curious if you are going… by mike320
See https://github.com/musescore/MuseScore/pull/3500, the guitar channels part is not in yet though, as first we'd need to cleanup the mixer from too many channels, the idea is to show only those channels in mixer that are actually used in the score.
In reply to See https://github.com… by Jojo-Schmitz
See also related request https://musescore.org/en/node/269938
In reply to OK, so what texts would… by Jojo-Schmitz
Jojo, in c), for nonmuted trumpets (for that sake, horns and trombones too), I saw many times "(nat)" or "(nat.)" in cursive letters, for "natural" , would be a good text for the default. I only saw them in scores when changing from muted to natural sound for the instrument. Attached a sample (horns returning to natural after being muted)
In reply to Jojo, in c), for nonmuted… by mdi1972
Your sample is from a handwritten score. I don't remember seeing nat. or nutural indicating open or not muted for brass instruments in printed scores. For Trumpets and Horns natural has an implication of instruments without valves. Open and Mute would be my first choice for these techniques since they are familiar to all English speakers (I expect these will be translated for other languages).
Having all these pre-set up for users will indeed be useful. Users like me (or midi1972) who prefer another default text are free to edit them in a custom palette, which I will definitely do.
In reply to Your sample is from a… by mike320
yes, you're right Mike. "(open)" seems to be the standard in printed scores. I'm used to check manuscript scores, my fault.
In reply to Thanks. So this is the… by Jojo-Schmitz
Hi-
Where do you actually input this code? Is it a case of saving your .mscz file as an .XML, diddling with it in notepad and then re-opening it as an .mscz? If so, whereabouts in the .XML file does this section of altered code go please?
Cheers
In reply to Hi-… by Arien Calaelen
See my post below, or edit the mscx file.
In reply to Hi-… by Arien Calaelen
The code Jojo displayed is from an .mpal file that saves a custom workspace. You can make a custom workspace. You can then add working pizz. (for example) then add it to the custom palette.
See https://musescore.org/en/handbook/mixer#mid-staff-change