No double repeat barline (start/end repeat) in MS3
MuseScore 3.0.1 seems to lack a barline for start/end repeat (the :|: barline).
This can even be seen even in the screenshot in the documentation:
https://musescore.org/en/handbook/3/barlines
Contrast the same page for MuseScore 2, where the start/end repeat barline is available:
Comments
Came up several times already, even today.
That end/start repeat barline in 2.x was really a fake, just add an end barline in measure N and a start repeat barline in measure N+1
In reply to Came up several times… by Jojo-Schmitz
Great, thanks!
In reply to Great, thanks! by musescore.3e7y…
"That end/start repeat barline in 2.x was really a fake"
I often see this question as well. A fake? Can you more elaborate?
And how was it a problem (issue?) to keep it in the palette, since users found it useful and are unpleasantly surprised that they no longer see it: two birds were killed with one stone, saving time, making it easier, etc.?
In reply to I often see this question as… by cadiz1
We may be able to put this back into the palette, but currently ut doesn't seem possible (not in a custome workspace/palette at least), as it'd require 2 elements getting added at the same time into the same palette cell. The end/star rebeat barline in 2.x was really only one barline, but got special cased in the score to split into 2 on system breaks. This was a hack that had been removed.
In reply to We may be able to put this… by Jojo-Schmitz
If it is put back in the palette I would love that the second design in the picture [Gould: Behind bars] is also available. I may be wrong but it seems to me much more common in printed music.
In reply to If it is put back in the… by Miguel Vicente…
@Miguel...
Hmm... looks like the end/start repeat second design eliminates the 'thin bar line' at the repeat dots.
So...
How should it behave if, as changes are made to the score, it splits into 2 on a system break?
That is, should the (missing) thin lines get added to the dots whenever the end/start repeat is split; and then removed again if the split repeat gets moved back onto one system?
In reply to @Miguel... Hmm... looks like… by Jm6stringer
Yes, I think so.
In reply to Yes, I think so. by Miguel Vicente…
Just for the record: SMuFL calls it repeatRightLeftThick (vs. repeatRightLeft), and lists it as a recommended stylistic alternative.
In reply to I often see this question as… by cadiz1
@cadiz …
+1