Find a numerical rehearsal mark using Ctrl-F

See https://github.com/musescore/MuseScore/pull/2526
This would however mean that a rehearsal mark "Rn" won't be found (with n being number). "Pn" won't be found already.

While at it I disallowd measure number 0 to be searched for (doesn't make any sense) and allowed negative pages number to be searched for (these are possible)

I wonder whether this could get extended to allow searching for measure numbers as shown in score, i.e. take pickup measures, manual measure number offsets and section breaks into account?
This has been requested recently. Maybe with a '#' as the prefix to denote that you want to go to a 'logical' measure

Another possible extension would be to go to a certain section, e.g. entering "S3" would take you to the first measure of the 3rd section.
Mabye "S3#4" to get you to the 4th 'logical' measure (i.e. not counting a prickup measure) of that section.

Note we also have a few "timeline" proposals for GSoC that this starts to cross into.

Fixed in branch master, commit 76f5bbf261

fix #105256: allow searching for numerical rehearsal marks

by prefixing with 'r'. While at it disallow measure number 0 (which by
definition doesn't exist anyway) and allow negative page numbers (which
are possible, via page number offset).

Fixed in branch master, commit e789b710c2

Merge pull request #2526 from Jojo-Schmitz/search

fix #105256: allow searching for numerical rehearsal marks

Fixed in branch 2.0.4, commit a3e89b0c20

fix #105256: allow searching for numerical rehearsal marks

by prefixing with 'r'. While at it disallow measure number 0 (which by
definition doesn't exist anyway) and allow negative page numbers (which
are possible, via page number offset).

Automatically closed -- issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.

I'd like to change the letter for rehearsal marks to M from R, to match the shortcut [Cmd]+[M]. Any objections?

yes
R is further down the alphabet and as such less likely to be use as a rehearsal mark itself, and also it is pretty close to P (shortcut for page) and S (for section, something I've been contemplating to implement)

Why does it matter if M might be used for a rehearsal mark? Only numbers can be searched for. And on my keyboard, M is actually closer to P than R is.

In my alphabet R is closer to P than M is.
And my idea to extend the search was to use p (page), r (numerical rehersal mark), # (relative measure number, relative to section and not counting pickup measures), s (section)

Hmm. I don't see any value at all to alphabetical proximity—unless it's actually consecutive letters, letters being sort of near each other might as well be random.

"...numerical rehearsal mark..." Not any letter. So what does it matter that R is less likely than M to be a rehearsal mark itself?

think reherasal mark "M1", "M2". Anyway, you asked for objections and got mine ;-)

I get that "MM1" to find rehearsal mark "M1" would be confusing, but there's no way to find rehearsal mark "M1," right? At least, "RM1" doesn't do it. Or is that something that you're planning on?

My issue is that M is already for rehearsal Mark—see the default shortcut under Add > Text—and I'd hate to have to remember which letter is associated with the rehearsal mark in which context.

the M as a shortcut for rehersal mark is a moving target, users can cange it.
Searching for "M1" currently works (Ctrl+F, M1), but won't after your proposed change.

This is odd. In 2.0.3, "M1" doesn't work. In the nightlies, "RM1" doesn't work—but "M1" does. Shouldn't the prefix letter be required?