Note hides behind others in chord

• Aug 23, 2013 - 17:33

1. Open attached score (produced in 1.3).
2. Click on note.
3. Move it Up/Down to the direction of another note.

Desired result: The note moves to the other side of the stem.
Actual result: The note hides behind the other.

Discussion: The desired result could save from having to go into Inspector and changing 'Mirror Head':

However, I wanted to know opinions before possibly submitting this to the tracker, if it doesn't already exist.

Using MuseScore 2.0 Nightly Build (64ff9de) - Mac 10.7.5.

Attachment Size
Note hides behind others in chord.mscz 1.44 KB

Comments

I'd say it depends entirely on *why* you'd be putting two of the same note on the same stem. That should be extremely rare. And of the very few cases where you'd want to do this, I'd guess about half the time you want to see both noteheads - in which case sure, having an automatic mirror helps - and the other half of the time you would be wanting them hidden, in which case MuseScore would just be doing something unnecessarily you'd have to undo.

Just replying to your first post:

I would say that hiding it just seems to be incorrect behaviour by the program and doesn't serve anyone, so it would make sense to utilise the mirroring function - now, you know for what purpose :). Incidentally, I don't think it's that rare ;).

I had reservations also because there might be problems in instances of multi-voice, so I was wanted to ask others who have more experience.

I'm curious - is 'mirror' the correct term? Just because of the drum example, in which different note heads are used. Maybe I'm taking it too literally :)?

In reply to by chen lung

There really cannot be any debate that this is rare by any objective measure, if we are talking about situations where it happens in a single voice. In multivoice settings, it is of course totally commonplace, but the rules there are reasonably clear, I think. So yes, we need to make that distinction. Edit: but I think I do now agree that mirroring by default makes more sense for the single voice case.

In reply to by chen lung

I don't understand what the "swap" would do. What would the difference be?

Also not sure what sort of "problems" you mean for multivoice. There are rules to follow, MuseScore needs to follow them. Do you mean, cases where I think it's likely that MuseScore might currently get the rules wrong? I guess anything is possible - this has been a source of issues for a while now, I think. Unisons and seconds both. Then I guess situatins where you have both at the same time.

No idea about MusicXML.

In reply to by Marc Sabatella

With swap, you could exchange notes that may have different properties (e.g. another notehead) or purposes.

After some reading, I think I'm a bit clearer on multi-voice unison and indeed adjacent notes - I'll address those soon (probably via a test suite in the issue tracker).

Do you still have an unanswered question? Please log in first to post your question.