Survey: music reading

1] 5
2] 5
3] The font is "traditional" - I learned from music marked like this. Also, I find it easier to read dynamics which are not too tall - I think this is because it distinguishes them from notes (which are tall - blobs with tails).
4] Version 3 too closely resembles chord symbols
5] I had not noticed but then I had not looked and nor had I played the pieces. I feel that squatter, bold numerals are best.
6] From easiest to most difficult - 5, 4, 2, 6, 1, 3
7] I find Number 7 more difficult to read than Number 1.
8] I do not like the appearance of Number 7. I have learned to read music over many years in a particular way and I find the wavy beams distracting.
9] It is distracting.
10] The little notes are not helpful. They disturb the rhythm of the piece as your eye scans it.
11] Never.
12] They are all equal and all equally bad, in my opinion. It is as if you had learned a language from childhood and now someone has decided that all the words shall be spelled in a different way now.

Perhaps it would be different if you asked someone who has only recently started to read music? I suggest you ask this. For information, I started reading music 40+ years ago, always tried to write it as I saw it (in mainly older classical and in brass band pieces) and taught myself to transpose (playing a Bb instrument helped).