Musescore master is now built against Qt5
More details here http://dev-list.musescore.org/MuseScore-master-branch-now-requires-Qt5-…
More details here http://dev-list.musescore.org/MuseScore-master-branch-now-requires-Qt5-…
Do you still have an unanswered question? Please log in first to post your question.
Comments
Latest Windows build using Qt 5.1 is up on http://ist.uwaterloo.ca/~schepers/musescore
In reply to Latest Windows build using Qt by schepers
The first mac nightly is available http://ftp.osuosl.org/pub/musescore/macosx/nightly/MuseScoreNightly-201…
And the first Windows nightly here http://ftp.osuosl.org/pub/musescore/windows/nightly/MuseScoreNightly-20…
Compilation instructions for both Mac and Windows have been updated. See http://musescore.org/en/developers-handbook/compilation
In reply to The first mac nightly is by [DELETED] 5
They are now build hourly, regardless whether a new commit is there or not?!
And the new QT5 Versions seem to be 25% larger (44MB vs 33MB) than the older ones.
In reply to They are now build hourly, by Jojo-Schmitz
Just a remaining bug from my testing. They are build hourly only if there is a new commit. The size could be optimized a bit.
In reply to Just a remaining bug from my by [DELETED] 5
There are quite a few additional DLLs
In reply to There are quite a few by Jojo-Schmitz
There are more DLLs because Qt5 is more modular that Qt4. They splitted several DLLs (or Qt modules). Unfortunatly, MuseScore uses most of them. We could reduce drastically the size of the package by building and linking Qt statically...
In reply to There are more DLLs because by [DELETED] 5
DLLs make sense when code is shared amongst mutliple applications or instances of MuseScore, but this is very unlikely to happen on Windows (only on a Windows Terminal Server), isn't it? Same on Mac I guess, but can be quite different on Linux?