What are linked staves?
I have done searches and looked at the index in the handbook, but can find no definition.
Thanks.
I have done searches and looked at the index in the handbook, but can find no definition.
Thanks.
Do you still have an unanswered question? Please log in first to post your question.
Comments
They are a new feature in the upcoming 2.0, hence not documented in the 1.x handbook.
In reply to They are a new feature in the by Jojo-Schmitz
Okay, but that is not an explanation. What are they? :)
In reply to Okay, but that is not an by xavierjazz
same as parts in 1.x, only that changes to parts get reflected in parent score and vice versa
In reply to same as parts in 1.x, only better by Jojo-Schmitz
So, if I understand, it is, for example, when parts are generated from a score and changes are made to a part, those changes will be reflected in the score?
That was my first assumption, but reading some of the threads about linked staves confused me. Please signify if my initial assumption was correct.
Thanks.
In reply to So, if I understand, it is, by xavierjazz
At least it matches mine ;-)
In reply to So, if I understand, it is, by xavierjazz
What you are describing - a connection between the score and parts - are what I would call linked *parts*. Linked *staves* are the underlying mechanism that are used to implement linked parts. But this same linked staves mechanism is also used for a totally different situation: where you have a piece for guitar and you want two staves, one displaying standard notation and the other displaying tablature. The effect is the same, changes made to one staff automatically affect the other. But here we are talking about two staves within the same score (or part).
So for example, the recent thread and corresponding bug report about chord symbols refers only to the latter case. Definitely, chord symbols added to a score should appear in the parts and vice versa. But if one of those parts is a guitar part, and it is written using two two linked staves (one standard notation and one tablature), should the chord symbols appear on both staves? I'm thinking no. And perhaps the same for text, dynamics, etc - but I'm not sure.
In reply to What you are describing - a by Marc Sabatella
Ahhh, thank you Marc.
Regards,
In reply to What you are describing - a by Marc Sabatella
Re: "But if one of those parts is a guitar part, and it is written using two two linked staves (one standard notation and one tablature), should the chord symbols appear on both staves? I'm thinking no. And perhaps the same for text, dynamics, etc - but I'm not sure."
My thought is that less clutter is better. If there is an actual reason to duplicate text, dynamics ets. I'm all for it, but to my mind the main purpose of notation is to transfer information in the clearest possible manner, and clutter is not a way to do that.
In reply to Re: "But if one of those by xavierjazz
These 2 staves are alternative ways of spelling the same music, the musician would read either one or the other, so dynamics are needed on both. Chord symbols are a somewhat additional information, maybe for some other musician improvising along, so no need to duplicate.
Perhaps it is unnecessary, but I consider it a way to practice with the manual, and it might be useful to someone (maybe).
I'm going with the translation?
In reply to @xavierjazz by Shoichi
@Shoichi: ???????????
:)
In reply to @Shoichi: ??????????? by xavierjazz
I was preparing the picture:
http://musescore.org/it/manuale/impaginazione-e-formattazione
In reply to I'm sorry, by Shoichi
Hi Shoichi.
I think there is a mis-understanding. Please see Marc's description, which answers my question.
Regards,