Linux & Flathub

• Jan 3, 2025 - 05:48

I'm curious about whether Musescore works w/Flathub to update the version provided for installation using Flathub? Currently v.4.4.3 is there but there are some serious bugs in the Linux version (at least that's the case under Ubuntu 24.01). It would be nice if v.4.4.4 was available as those bugs seem to have been taken care of. Of course, one can simply utilize the Appimage from the Terminal or Files. Snaps, which stilll is back at v.3.6.2, seems to be a lost cause.


Comments

I used to use install Ubuntu Studio and then started using the AppImages but am just interested - what benefit is there to using a Flatpack version of a program (if it is available)? Is it more secure, does it take up less disc space, is it more stable or is it because you can set it to auto-update/upgrade?

In reply to by underquark

For me, the benefit is primarily the ability to launch the app by clicking the musescore icon in Show Apps or by double-clicking a mscz file from a directory. To use the appimage, I must first open it, then find the mscz file and open it within Musescore. The only negative is that the most recent update for an app may not yet be available.
That said, I had not previously known about Ubuntu Studio, so thanks! I'll consider trying that out. I presume it can be launched from a flash drive like other Linux distros.

In reply to by BeFreeIL

I'm not sure if MuseScore is still in Ubuntu Studio or not. Even if it were, i think I'd still use the AppImage. I use ubuntu 22.04 and I've got several MS icons in my Task Manager bar and when I double-click on a file in Dolphin it opens in 4.4.4 - it's just a matter of setting up the file association. AppImages get updated by the development team, other linux versions rely on third parties.

OS: Ubuntu 22.04.5 LTS, Arch.: x86_64, MuseScore Studio version (64-bit): 4.4.2-242570931, revision: 3130f97

In reply to by underquark

So the Flatpak is over here: https://flathub.org/apps/org.musescore.MuseScore
Notice the yellow unverified warning.
Meaning nobody verified the package. And probably no end user will verify it neither.
Do you think that is more secure than the official appimage build by MuseScore team?
IMHO, this is a security nightmare and those flatpaks would not pass any security audit in a corporate environment.
The appimage integrates perfectly if one uses the install switch. (at least on my systems)

Do you still have an unanswered question? Please log in first to post your question.