5 issues with the 2.0 RC

• Mar 19, 2015 - 17:52

Hi,

I just started playing around with 2.0 release candidate on Windows 7 (love the new look by the way), and I've come across five potential issues, listed in the order of how important they are to me personally.

1. Selecting a range of notes seems to have gone from 2-dimensional to 1-dimensional. What I mean is that in 1.3, I could select a note, then hold shift-right or shift-left to select additional notes on the same staff, and also hold shift-up or shift-down to select the same range of notes on multiple staffs. In 2.0, it seems I can only go left or right. Is there a new way to extend range selections to multiple staffs?

2. I understand that with the release of 1.0, the default key for entering rests changed from 'space' to '0', and I understand the reasoning was to be consistent with other similar software. However, I am accustomed to using 'space' to enter rests, and I was able to set that option in 1.3, but I no longer remember how. Is it still possible in 2.0, and how can I do it?

3. The Open File dialog that appears when using the File->Open menu command doesn't seem to remember its folder location, and just goes back to its default folder every single time I use it. Is there a way to make it remember it's current location?

4. It seems like the soundfont for choral voices plays back a few cents flat in 2.0. Am I crazy, or has anyone else noticed this, too?

5. Am I wrong, or in the instrument selection were all the orchestral string parts (Violins 1, Violins 2, Violas, etc.) replaced with a single String Section instrument? Not a big deal by any means, but it's a bit of a pain to have to manually change clefs and staff names every time a create a new score, and I guess I don't understand the value in having a reduced instrument selection.

Thanks for creating such an awesome product!


Comments

1. It is Alt+up/down now
2. I don't see why you wouldn't be able to use Space for Rest, you just have to free up that shortcut, it is used for 'next syllable'
3. has been fixed meanwhile
You're rignt on 5. To easy your issue or having to rename staves, you could create a template.

Regarding 4 - there are a number of issues with the new default soundfont which are gradually being addressed. You can always get the latest SF2 version from the Soundfont Forum.....
http://musescore.org/en/node/41521

Any feedback on what might need tweaking is also welcome on that thread:)

Regarding 5. it was anticipated that one of the Orchestral templates would be used as a base to work from.

You have probably noticed that there is more emphasis on the use of templates rather than creating every new score from scratch?

In reply to by ge97aa

BTW, not sure if you noticed, but the shortcuts for extending selection vertically have been changed back to the old ones in the latest builds and will be the final release. it is indeed more consistent, although I personally will miss using Shift+up/down for diatonic transposition (it is now Shift+Alt+Up/Down.

As for templates, this was an underutilized feature in 1.3, in large part because they weren't that convenient. When creating a new score, you had to choose whether to your a template or not before you even saw what templates were available, which isn't very friendly, plus there weren't all that many of them. Creating and using your own template required you to know what magic folder to save into and to have system administrator privileges to do so.

For 2.0, we do hope that templates will becomes more a part of people's regular workflow. Both taking advantages of the pre-existing ones - which are more extensive and more clearly presented to the user on score creation - and creating your own, which go into a clearly marked "Templates" folder right next to your "Scores" folder. But of course, people accustomed to 1.3 may take a while to start thinking about templates this way.

Do you still have an unanswered question? Please log in first to post your question.