Hiding non-empty staves from specific part of the conductor score ?
Hello,
For my arrangement, I'd like only one staff of changes to be visible in the conductor (as it takes way too much room for redundant information, see the screenshot), while still being present in individual part for each instrument (as each musician will need the chord changes to be able to solo/comp).
Is that something that is currently possible ?
Thanks !
Edit to clarify : the screenshot only shows the part I'd like to declutter, it's not the whole song. The rest of the piece features written parts for a whole sextet.
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
Capture d’écran 2023-02-02 à 20.53.46.png | 87.16 KB |
Comments
Sorry to be dense... Does "in the conductor" mean "in the conductor's score"? Also, what version of MuseScore are you using? 'Changes' means the (text) chord notations?
In reply to Sorry to be dense... Does … by Are Jayem
Sorry I guess french + jazz tends not to translate too well to english for musical terms.
Yes I mean in the conductor's score/main score, regrouping every parts.
Using MuseScore 4.0.1.
And yes, by changes I mean the written chord notation.
It is very unclear why you would need a conductor's score if there are only chord changes in the song.
But, otherwise, a way to do this is to make a new conductor-part with all the relevant instruments/staffs. Here is the handbook link for MS3:
https://musescore.org/en/handbook/3/parts#Customize_parts
In reply to It is very unclear why you… by AndreasKågedal
Because there aren't only chord changes in the song.
This is only showing the solo part of a larger jazz arrangement, hence why you'd still want to have it integrated with the rest of the piece and not as a second part on the side.