Looked at that yesterday already, but it being a few weeks old could not imagine that to be the problematic score.
80 half notes == 160 quarter notes == BPM, and that is exactly what it does play at.
Nothing about the 120BPM you claimed having set it nor about 80BPM playback.
On MuseSCore.com and inside MuseScore it does play at 160BPM, unless you change the tempo in the playpanel to a different percentage
BTW: you seem to have written it in 2.0.3, are you aware thet 2.1 is out since May?
Also I noticed you used multiple empty vertical frames to format the cover page, you need only one, for the Title and Arranger/Composer and to attach the image, when you add a system break to that frame, see attached
See the "File attachments" link below where you type your reply to attach a score.
Meanwhile, I'll guess that either you have overridden the tempo using the slider in the Play panel, or you have disabled the "Follow text" option for your tempo marking in the Inspector, or the text contains a syntax error, or you are in compound meter (eg, 6/8) and have specified the tempo in quarter notes rather than dotted quarters or vice versa.
Make sure you have the correct counting unit (enter tempo with the texts provided in the palette and pick the correct counting unit--you can afterwards overwrite them any way you like without changing the entered tempo). Internally Musescore always counts quartet notes, but your music might be in compound meter (6/8 or a relative of it). There a setting of quarter = 120 will get you a feeling of tempo 80 since you count dotted quarters in these meters.
This was more of a problem with version 1 where counting in quarters was the only way to enter it and you had to do the math yourself in "complicated" meters (as simple as cut time actually) to get it right. But depending on how you enter this you might still have this problem in version 2.
Comments
Can you post the score that is causing problems? And, what exactly is happening in terms of glitching?
In reply to Can you post the score that by underquark
I have my tempo at 120 BPM and it's as slow as 80 BPM!!!!!! I don't get it.....
In reply to I have my tempo at 120 BPM by gamergotgames
Being frustrated won't help - attaching the score will. Do you know how?
In reply to Being frustrated won't help - by xavierjazz
Here is the score ----->
https://musescore.com/user/10354706/scores/4089866
I need to fix it for now since it's at 160 BPM (80 in half note beats)
In reply to Here is the score by gamergotgames
So it is
https://musescore.com/user/10354706/scores/4089866
Looked at that yesterday already, but it being a few weeks old could not imagine that to be the problematic score.
80 half notes == 160 quarter notes == BPM, and that is exactly what it does play at.
Nothing about the 120BPM you claimed having set it nor about 80BPM playback.
On MuseSCore.com and inside MuseScore it does play at 160BPM, unless you change the tempo in the playpanel to a different percentage
But indeed changing the tempo to something else has problems until Save/Close/Open, this seems a known issue, see #78416: Tempo text oddities in score with linked parts until save/reopen.
BTW: you seem to have written it in 2.0.3, are you aware thet 2.1 is out since May?
Also I noticed you used multiple empty vertical frames to format the cover page, you need only one, for the Title and Arranger/Composer and to attach the image, when you add a system break to that frame, see attached
In reply to So it by Jojo-Schmitz
Thanks a lot and for the attatchment
In reply to I have my tempo at 120 BPM by gamergotgames
See the "File attachments" link below where you type your reply to attach a score.
Meanwhile, I'll guess that either you have overridden the tempo using the slider in the Play panel, or you have disabled the "Follow text" option for your tempo marking in the Inspector, or the text contains a syntax error, or you are in compound meter (eg, 6/8) and have specified the tempo in quarter notes rather than dotted quarters or vice versa.
In reply to I have my tempo at 120 BPM by gamergotgames
Try removing the 120 BPM tempo marking and re-adding it. If that doesn't work, you can set the tempo that it indicates using the Inspector.
Make sure you have the correct counting unit (enter tempo with the texts provided in the palette and pick the correct counting unit--you can afterwards overwrite them any way you like without changing the entered tempo). Internally Musescore always counts quartet notes, but your music might be in compound meter (6/8 or a relative of it). There a setting of quarter = 120 will get you a feeling of tempo 80 since you count dotted quarters in these meters.
This was more of a problem with version 1 where counting in quarters was the only way to enter it and you had to do the math yourself in "complicated" meters (as simple as cut time actually) to get it right. But depending on how you enter this you might still have this problem in version 2.
In reply to Make sure you have the by azumbrunn
Thanks a lot but still...
In reply to Thanks a lot but still... by gamergotgames
... still we'd need your score to check what's going on there
In reply to ... still we'd need your by Jojo-Schmitz
Up there
Also, how do you explain 140 BPM slower than 139 BPM?????
In reply to Also, how do you explain 140 by gamergotgames
Ears playing tricks on you, or the same bug as described before you where you need to reload the score sometimes to hear the chance take effect.
In reply to Ears playing tricks on you, by Marc Sabatella
THanks :)