If you want to keep working, just select "ignore".
TO fix it, go to measure 107. There is corruption in that measure. You will most likely have to insert a new measure there and redo that bar and then delete that bar.
I tried to fix this running AppImage 2.0.3, ubuntu 64-bit and the program crashed on seelctinf the bar. It might need exported to MusicXML and the code edited manually.
I saved it as an mscx file then edited it using Bluefish to delete Measures 106 and 107 and insert a couple of copies of Measure 105 in their place. Then I manually copied the notes from the original into the new score. I have made the assumption that there is meant to be an 1/8th beat rest at the beginning of Measure 107.
When selecting a corrupt measures leads to a crash, the solution is to select from the measure before to the one after and do a swap of voices twice, then remove the extra rests, then fix the measure if needed.
Oh, yeh, I keep forgetting that there are easier ways to do some things rather than hacking the code. Voice-swapping does, indeed, work very well here.
Comments
If you want to keep working, just select "ignore".
TO fix it, go to measure 107. There is corruption in that measure. You will most likely have to insert a new measure there and redo that bar and then delete that bar.
In reply to If you want to keep working,… by xavierjazz
I tried to fix this running AppImage 2.0.3, ubuntu 64-bit and the program crashed on seelctinf the bar. It might need exported to MusicXML and the code edited manually.
In reply to If you want to keep working,… by xavierjazz
I saved it as an mscx file then edited it using Bluefish to delete Measures 106 and 107 and insert a couple of copies of Measure 105 in their place. Then I manually copied the notes from the original into the new score. I have made the assumption that there is meant to be an 1/8th beat rest at the beginning of Measure 107.
In reply to I saved it as an mscx file… by underquark
When selecting a corrupt measures leads to a crash, the solution is to select from the measure before to the one after and do a swap of voices twice, then remove the extra rests, then fix the measure if needed.
In reply to When selecting a corrupt… by mike320
Wow.
In reply to When selecting a corrupt… by mike320
Oh, yeh, I keep forgetting that there are easier ways to do some things rather than hacking the code. Voice-swapping does, indeed, work very well here.
Thank you guys for the support ... my specialty teacher would be cut off my head if I would not rewrote that piece for the euphonium ...