Problem in MuseScore 2.0b1 with repeats starting at the beginning of a staff?
I attached a picture of what I think is a problem. I forced a new line in the score at the beginning of a repeat, but the repeat starting barline ends up both at the beginning of the line and at the end of the preceding line. This doesn't seem right. Am I doing something wrong? Or is this how it's supposed to work?
Thanks for any info.
- Mike.
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
Problem with repeats starting on a new line-.pdf | 66.12 KB |
Comments
have you selected the right barline?
If the barline is the correct one the graphic form is ok
(maybe I did not understand?)
In reply to would be preferable the file: * .mscz, by Shoichi
I've attached 3 .mscz files, using the default score that comes up when I launch the program.
The first one, I put a left had repeat at measure 5 and a right repeat at measure 8.
The second one is after I delete the "newline" at the end of measure 4.
And the third is after I've put the "newline" back in by clicking on the left repeat between measures 4 and 5 and hitting the return key.
Note that after that last step, I have a left had repeat at the end of the first line after measure 4, and another left had repeat at the beginning of the second line before measure 5.
I believe that the correct behavior would be for the first and third scores to have the identical appearance.
I hope this makes it more clear.
Thanks! :-)
- Mike.
In reply to The barline I selected is correct... by carneyweb
You are right,
you need to clear the final barline (measure 4) and re-enter from the palette. I do not know if it's a bug but I have not found an explanation.
Maybe Marc knows the answer?
In reply to You are right, by Shoichi
There is a known bug specifically with start repeats on line breaks preceded by multimeasure rests that causes these incorrect open repeats to show on the previous system. See #18510: incorrect barlines with start repeat at beginning of system. This has been around a long time; I very much hope to see it fixed before 2.0.
In reply to There is a known bug by Marc Sabatella
Thanks so much Marc.
That's exactly what I was wondering. If it wasn't a known bug I was going to file a new issue.
BTW... Job well done to you and all the other people that have poured their blood, sweat, and tears into 2.0. It's outstanding!
- Mike.